[{"content":"Past and on-going projects including research, intervention programs, (virtual) workshops and consultation.\n","date":"30 August 2026","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/projects/","section":"Current and Past Projects","summary":"","title":"Current and Past Projects","type":"projects"},{"content":"Upcoming and past talks includes invited talks, oral presentations, panel discussions, roundtables, and symposiums.\n","date":"30 August 2026","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/talks/","section":"Upcoming and Past Talks","summary":"","title":"Upcoming and Past Talks","type":"talks"},{"content":"I\u0026rsquo;m a Doctoral Researcher and Intercultural Psychologist, with ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon. My research focuses on how individuals and societies respond to intercultural relations, migration, particularly in relation to refugees.\nEssentially, I conduct research, write papers, give talks, and facilitate workshops.\n","date":"27 August 2026","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/","section":"","summary":"","title":"","type":"page"},{"content":"Hi! I\u0026rsquo;m Ling Ling. Hi! Olá! 你好! Apa khabar? I\u0026rsquo;m Ling Ling.\nI\u0026rsquo;m a Doctoral Researcher and Intercultural Psychologist in social psychology focusing on how individuals and societies respond to intercultural relations, migration, particularly in relation to refugees. Essentially, I conduct research, write papers, give talks, and facilitate workshops.\nMy PhD research focuses on asylum-seekers and refugees\u0026rsquo; psychological and sociocultural adaptation in resettled and transit countries using mixed methods, specifically interventions, meta-analyses, thematic analyses, and psychometrics. I am especially interested in how psychological processes shape responses to displacement in ways that have real-world social and policy implications.\nBefore entering academia, I worked in engineering, travel technology, learning \u0026amp; development, and humanitarian organisations, across Europe, United States, and the Asia Pacific. I was exposed to cultural and societal challenges of discrimination and inequality in cross-cultural environments. As such, these experience continues to inform how I approach research questions and the kinds of problems I am drawn to.\nI aim to conduct research that is both methodologically rigorous and socially responsible, particularly when working on topics involving vulnerable or displaced populations. In my research, I use a participatory approach to generate new knowledge that informs researchers and practitioners in their programmes and interventions.\nI am also a member of:\nThe Global Network of Psychologists for Human Rights (GNPHR) The International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology (IACCP) The International Association for Intercultural Relations (IAIR) The International Council of Psychologists (ICP) I am currently based at the Centre for Psychological Research and Social Intervention (CIS) at ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon. I welcome opportunities for discussion and collaboration on research related to migration, intergroup relations, and social policy. If you\u0026rsquo;re interested to connect, please get in touch.\nElsewhere # 23 November 2023: Meet the PhD students of 2023/24 20 June 2023: Are Refugees Truly Finding Well-Being and Hope in Portugal? 14 January 2023: A Long Journey Home: On the Road to Refugees’ Integration ","date":"22 August 2026","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/about/","section":"","summary":"","title":"About","type":"page"},{"content":"","date":"2 July 2026","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/categories/","section":"Categories","summary":"","title":"Categories","type":"categories"},{"content":" Authors # Ling Ling Tai, ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon, Portugal Ryan Yumin Chua, Monash University, Malaysia Rita Guerra, ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon, Portugal Kinga Bierwiaczonek, Leibniz Institute for Psychology, Germany Abstract # Migration and adaptation to a new cultural environment can be highly stressful. For asylum-seekers and refugees (ASR), these challenges are exacerbated due to experiences of forced displacement and exposure to human rights violations. Such stressors can significantly hinder their ability to adjust to a new country. While existing studies on migrant adaptation tend to examine both positive and negative psychological adaptation (emotional well-being and subjective life satisfaction) and sociocultural adaptation (acquisition of skills and behaviours needed for everyday functioning), research focusing on ASR requires urgent investigation as its population continues to increase with protracted conflicts globally. Furthermore, most ASR-related studies focus predominantly on negative psychological adaptation, overlooking the broader spectrum of adaptation experiences.\nThis study, therefore, examines both the positive and negative psychological and sociocultural adaptation processes of ASR in transit and resettlement countries. We conducted 14 focus group discussions involving 73 adults aged 18-65, with an average length stay of 3.47 years. Participants were located across three countries: Malaysia (N = 35) a transit country, Portugal (N = 20) and Germany (N = 18) as resettlement countries. Using a theory-based thematic analysis, we identified several common themes across the three countries. For psychological adaptation, participants highlighted positive elements such as a renewed sense of safety and hope for the future; while negative psychological aspects identified included persistent fear and sleep disturbances linked to the threat of deportation, and irregular employment in the receiving countries. In terms of sociocultural adaptation, ASR emphasised the importance of obtaining protection status, acquiring work-related skills and adopting public social norms as key components of adjusting to daily life in the receiving countries. Additional themes highlighted external stressors shaping adaptation, such as family connections, community support, and broader social interactions.\nOverall, our findings reveal that ASR experiences are unique, influenced by context-specific challenges, as they navigate pathways toward protection, stability, and eventually citizenship. This study offers a nuanced and comprehensive understanding of ASR adaptation processes. The insights generated can support the development of more responsive policies and targeted interventions to enable ASR to build safe, stable lives in their new countries.\nKeywords: refugees, asylum-seekers, psychological adaptation, sociocultural adaptation\nThis oral presentation took place at the IACCP Conference, from 14-18 July 2026, at the KU Leuven, Belgium.\nPsychological and Sociocultural Adaptation of Asylum-Seekers and Refugees: A Thematic-Analysis by Ling Ling ","date":"2 July 2026","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/talks/2026-thematic-analysis/","section":"Upcoming and Past Talks","summary":"","title":"Psychological and Sociocultural Adaptation of Asylum-Seekers and Refugees: A Thematic-Analysis in Germany, Malaysia, and Portugal","type":"talks"},{"content":"","date":"2 July 2026","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/categories/talks/","section":"Categories","summary":"","title":"Talks","type":"categories"},{"content":"BRIDGE: Connecting Lived Experience \u0026amp; Refugee Mental Healthcare This 70-minute virtual panel brings together researchers, practitioners, and refugees who have lived and worked within displacement contexts across West and Southeast Asia. Panelists will discuss the unique psychological and sociocultural adaptation processes of refugees in both resettled and transit countries, highlighting how these experiences differ from other migrant groups. The discussion will also deepen understanding of the specific needs and strengths of women refugees, offering insights to enhance culturally responsive mental health practice.\nPanelists # Kinara Yang, PharmD, RPh Sanaz Yaghmai, PsyD Ling Ling Tai, Ling Ling Tai, MPsych Moderators # Jennifer Young, PsyD Jacinda Lee, ALMFT This live webinar took place on the 7th November 2025, and sponsored by APA Division 35: Society for the Psychology of Women\n","date":"8 November 2025","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/talks/2025-bridge/","section":"Upcoming and Past Talks","summary":"","title":"BRIDGE: Connecting Lived Experience \u0026 Refugee Mental Healthcare","type":"talks"},{"content":" Authors # Ling Ling Tai, ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon, Portugal Rita Guerra, ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon, Portugal Kinga Bierwiaczonek, Leibniz Institute for Psychology, Germany Abstract # The global population of forcibly displaced surpassed 120 million end of 2024, a figure that shows no sign of declining. Forced migration is marked with loss and trauma, followed by the challenges of navigating unfamiliar cultures and environments. Adaptation requires learning strange behaviours and mindsets, often without adequate support or guidance.\nThis systematic review examines adaptation experiences of asylum-seekers and refugees in their resettlement or transit countries. We included 199 studies that involved participants from 24 origin countries, now residing in 35 countries, with a total sample size of 131,928. Of the 226 adaptation measures recorded, 95% addressed psychological adaptation, with 71% focusing on negative outcomes. Only 11 (5%) studies addressed sociocultural adaptation.\nOur meta-analysis revealed high heterogeneity in psychological adaptation outcomes (Q = 3128.39, p \u0026lt; .0001), indicating wide variability in experiences across studies. In contrast, sociocultural adaptation studies were limited (k = 6, N = 2018).\nThese findings highlight an overemphasis on psychological adaptation, particularly its negative aspects, and the inadequate attention to sociocultural adaptation. The high heterogeneity observed further underscores the diverse challenges and factors that influence asylum-seekers and refugees’ adaptation. This imbalance raises concerns that current research, policies, and programs may not fully capture or address the complex realities of forced migration and resettlement.\nThis presentation took place at the:\nJoint IAIR \u0026amp; IACCP Conference, on the 28 June 2025, at the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. XX PhD Meeting In Psychology, on the 23 May 2025, at Iscte-University Institute of Lisbon, Portugal. 83rd Annual Conference of the International Council of Psychologists (ICP 2025) Human Rights, Justice, and Dignity: Social Inclusion \u0026amp; Migration, on the 5th of April 2025, at the Erasmus University College, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. New Arrival? A Systematic Review of Refugee's Psychological \u0026 Sociocultural Adaptation by Ling Ling","date":"2 July 2025","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/talks/2025-systematic-review/","section":"Upcoming and Past Talks","summary":"","title":"New Arrival? A Systematic Review of the Psychological \u0026 Sociocultural Adaptation of Refugees and Aylum-Seekers","type":"talks"},{"content":"","date":"5 April 2025","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/categories/roundtable/","section":"Categories","summary":"","title":"Roundtable","type":"categories"},{"content":"Chair: Sharon Coen (University of Salford, United Kingdom)\nAuthors: Polli Hagenaars (C5, private practice), Mary Beth Kenkel (Florida Institute of Technology), Ling Ling Tai (CIS-iscte), Josephine Tan (Lakehead University), Elaine Oloaye (Brookdale Community College), Ibeh Agbanyim (Grand Canyon University), Elaine Congress (Fordham University), Stephanie Szeto (St. Francis University), Sijohn Joseph (Chaithanya Psychotherapy Center)\nPresenters: Polli Hagenaars (C5, private practice), Mary Beth Kenkel (Florida Institute of Technology), Ling Ling Tai (CIS-iscte)\nAbstract # This roundtable discussion – emerging from discussions held in the ICP’s Psychology of Democracy Reading Group – will focus on power dynamics in modern societies and how they affect migrant populations. Understanding power dynamics is essential when reading societal struggles through a psychological lens (Neal \u0026amp; Neal, 2011). These power dynamics also affect psychologist’ approach to – and understanding of – the processes underpinning knowledge production (Fisher, Sonn \u0026amp; Evans, 2007). Like Pratto and Stewart (2021) highlight, however, power is a distinguished construct from that of authority. The assignment of authority often rests on evaluations based on how the individual/s has achieved power. In WEIRD countries, this is often attributed to issues of merit. That is, there is a belief that powerful individuals have become (or remained) so because they deserve it. Powerful individuals therefore represent desirable qualities in a society, while powerless are people who lack these qualities or have undesirable characteristics (Sandel, 2020). This fundamental belief, that underpins much of the current populist rhetoric is often leveraged to glorify what Moghaddam (2019) calls Strongmen, while vilifying refugees and migrants. This dynamic becomes particularly apparent at times of crisis, where populists leverage the rhetoric of scarcity of resources to indicate that migrants and refugees are underserving recipients of the Countries’ scarce resources (Mols and Jetten, 2016). Imagery of ‘invasion,’ as well as language such as ‘the refugee crisis’ further deepen the problem (Goodman, 2007). Participants from the group will discuss implications of such phenomena for interpreting modern trends and their impact on migrants.\nShort Abstract # In light of discussions held in the Psychology and Democracy interest group at ICP, this roundtable aims to unravel the nexus between the perception of migrants and refugees and psychological processes of attribution of power and authority, populism, and meritocracy.\nThis roundtable took place at the ICP Conference, on the 4th April 2025, at the Erasmus University College, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.\n","date":"5 April 2025","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/talks/2025-roundtable-strongmen/","section":"Upcoming and Past Talks","summary":"","title":"Strongmen and the Othering of Migrants: Power and Meritocracy in Societies in Crisis","type":"talks"},{"content":" Abstract # The current research examined the psychological factors associated with refugee adaptation, focusing on Zomi refugees in Malaysia, an ethnic minority who fled Myanmar due to protracted conflict. Based on the psychological antecedents of the refugee integration (PARI) model (Echterhoff et al., 2020), this study considered the role of loss of control, perception of forcedness and related perils on the subjective well-being of Zomi refugees compared with non-Zomi refugees. Data were collected through an online survey involving Zomi refugees (N = 258) and non-Zomi refugees (N = 158) from May to August 2022. Using multigroup structural equations modelling, we found that the role of our variables of interest differed in the two groups. For non-Zomi refugees, loss of control was positively associated with the perception of forcedness and negatively linked with subjective well-being. For Zomi refugees, loss of control was negatively correlated with the perception of forcedness and not associated with subjective well-being. The indirect effect of perception of forcedness and related perils with subjective well-being via loss of control was not significant in either group. We propose that the Zomis have a different conception of control compared to non-Zomi refugees and suggest that specific cultural and contextual factors influence these differences. In the context of policies, we discuss practical implications and recommendations in the assessment and provision of support for refugees’ adaptation in Malaysia. The limitations, practical implications, and future research were discussed.\nKeywords: Zomi, PARI, psychological adaptation, subjective well-being, perception of forcedness, related perils, loss of control, refugees.\nThe invited talk took place on the\n12 September 2024, at the YSI @ Economic Development Workshop University Malaya, Malaysia. 13 November 2024, at Sunway University, Malaysia. 2024 Sunway U Presentation by Ling Ling","date":"30 November 2024","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/talks/2024-psychology-of-refugees/","section":"Upcoming and Past Talks","summary":"","title":"Psychology of Refugees: Zomi in Malaysia","type":"talks"},{"content":" Authors # Ling Ling Tai, ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon, Portugal (presenter) Rita Guerra, ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon, Portugal Kinga Bierwiaczonek, Leibniz Institute for Psychology, Germany Abstract # The global refugee population has doubled since 2016. In the first half of 2023, there were more than 110 million forcibly displaced people, and this trend will likely continue. In addition to the usual challenges of adapting to the host society, refugees also carry the physical and psychological burdens of forced displacement and human rights violations. The Psychological Antecedents of Refugee Integration (PARI) model (Echterhoff et al., 2020) includes two psychological factors as its central theme: perceived forcedness (i.e., the subjective experience of forced displacement) and related perils (i.e., the subjective experience of dangers associated with forced displacement). These factors are theorized to influence the refugees’ integration processes while coping with the demands of the host society. Moreover, post-arrival demands typically faced by refugees include perceived discrimination in various domains such as housing, employment, healthcare, and education. Evidence shows that discrimination negatively affects participation in host societies, reduces migrants’ adoption of the host society’s culture, reduces the likelihood of integration, and generally hinders subjective well-being Less known is the role of host country’s context for refugee psychological responses to displacement. In this study, we thus compare two refugee groups in two different contexts: refugees in Portugal and Zomi refugees in Malaysia. Portugal is a signatory of the UN Refugee Convention and Protocol and has a comprehensive integration policy, including healthcare access for asylum-seekers and cultural diversity education in schools. Portugal is ranked ‘Top Ten’on the Multicultural Policy Index. In contrast, Malaysia, does not have a national asylum system and are not signatories of the UN Refugee Convention and Protocol. The non-recognition of refugees means they have limited access to housing, employment, education, healthcare, and protection. Treated as “illegal immigrants”, refugees regularly face detention without trial or representation, forced removals, deportation, criminal prosecution, and corporal punishment by the local authorities. Provided these differences between contexts of reception, we expected that refugee groups in these two countries differ in their perceptions of discrimination, well-being, and their correlates. Indeed, results showed that perceived discrimination and related perils were significantly higher for Zomi refugees in Malaysia, while subjective well-being and perceived forcedness were considerably higher for refugees in Portugal. For both groups, perceived forcedness was negatively related to subjective well-being, but perceived discrimination was not significantly associated with subjective well-being. For refugees in Portugal, perceived discrimination was positively related to perceived forcedness. For Zomi refugees, perceived discrimination was positively associated with related perils. We propose that group differences are a product of the host country’s social and political factors. Limitations, practical implications, and future research avenues are discussed.\nThis presentation took place at the:\nThe XXVII International Congress of The International Association of Cross-Cultural Psychology, on the 7 August 2024, in Bali, Indonesia 33rd International Congress of Psychology, on the 23 July 2024, at Prague, Czechia. 82nd Annual Conference of the International Council of Psychologists, on the 20 July 2024, at the Prague University of Economics and Business Prague, Czechia. 2024 Conference Presentation by Ling Ling","date":"30 August 2024","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/talks/2024-well-being-and-discrimination/","section":"Upcoming and Past Talks","summary":"","title":"The Role of Host Country Contexts for Refugee Subjective Well Being and Perceptions of Discrimination.","type":"talks"},{"content":" Presenters # Josephine Tan (Lakehead University), Polli Hagenaars (C5, private practice), Mary Beth Kenkel (Florida Institute of Technology), Ibeh Agbanyim (Grand Canyon University), Elaine Oloaye (Brookdale Community College) Ling Ling Tai (Iscte-University Institute of Lisbon, Portugal)\nThis roundtable took place at the ICP Conference, on the 20 July 2024, at Prague University of Economics and Business Prague, Czechia.\nColorful Organic Positive Psychology Presentation by Ling Ling","date":"30 July 2024","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/talks/2024-roundtable-democracy/","section":"Upcoming and Past Talks","summary":"","title":"Round Table: Psychology and Democracy Reading Group","type":"talks"},{"content":"There was a research plan; then there was the actual data collection. My initial plan was to compare the psychological adaptation of refugees in Malaysia and Portugal. I hypothesised that the host country\u0026rsquo;s support (or lack thereof) could have helped or hindered refugees\u0026rsquo; adaptation.\nWithin a few short months of data collection, it became clear that I could not follow the original plan\u0026hellip; the most significant number of respondents received in the data collection were from the Zomi community in Malaysia. It would be misrepresenting the refugee population in Malaysia if the research were to be based on Zomi data alone. The Zomi is an ethnic group predominately from the Chin state of Myanmar. Many fled to Malaysia due to internal conflict.\nA failed research plan, turned out to be a fantastic scientific opportunity! Here, investigating the psychology of the Zomi people in Malaysia is a rare in research, indeed!\nAlong with presenting the research findings to our supportive partner, the North-South Initiative (NSI), I had the opportunity to present the Zomi research to the Children\u0026rsquo;s Training Centre (CTC) and the Zomi Association of Malaysia (ZAM), two other organisations who have helped tremendously with data collection. The presentation title is \u0026ldquo;How The Zomi Adapt to Life in Malaysia?\u0026rdquo;\nA significant finding from this research is that Zomi found ways to protect their psychological well-being from the negative experiences of the loss of control from forced displacement. Check out the presentation to find out possible reasons for how they have done this.\nThis presentation took place on the:\n6 April 2023, Children\u0026rsquo;s Training Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 15 March 2023, Zomi Association of Malaysia (ZAM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Zomi in Malaysia 2022 by Ling Ling ","date":"30 April 2023","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/talks/2023-how-zomi-adapt-to-msia/","section":"Upcoming and Past Talks","summary":"","title":"How Zomi Adapt to Life in Malaysia?","type":"talks"},{"content":"These research findings could not have happened without our supportive partner, the North-South Initiative (NSI). The presentation took place on the 12 March 2023, in Gombak, Malaysia. The presentation title is \u0026ldquo;Psychological Adaptation of Ahmadiyya in Malaysia\u0026rdquo;\nAhmadiyya in Malaysia 2022 by Ling Ling","date":"30 March 2023","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/talks/2022-ahmadiyya-adaptation/","section":"Upcoming and Past Talks","summary":"","title":"Psychological Adaptation of Ahmadiyya in Malaysia","type":"talks"},{"content":"Refugee research is a challenging endeavour. Researchers must strictly abide by the code of ethics to protect and prevent vulnerable groups and the people involved from harm before, during and after the research.\n\u0026ldquo;Do no harm\u0026rdquo; may sound simple, but it is far from easy.\nThat is why it is vital to collaborate with trusted partners to help make the essential connections and provide guidance in engaging with the refugee community and the organisations that support them. For my research, I was blessed to partner with the North-South Initiative (NSI), a Malaysian-based civil society organisation that aims to promote sustainable development and protect migrant worker\u0026rsquo;s rights in Malaysia.\nUpon graduation, I presented the research findings to NSI members and refugee leaders on the 28th February 2023. The research looked into the psychological adaptation of Zomi refugees in Malaysia compared to other refugees. If it wasn\u0026rsquo;t for the openness and collaboration of NSI, I would not have completed my masters project. My deepest gratitude.\nExamining Zomi Refugees’ Psychological Adaptation by Ling Ling","date":"29 March 2023","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/talks/2023-zomi-psychological-adaptation/","section":"Upcoming and Past Talks","summary":"","title":"Examining Zomi Refugees Psychological Adaptation","type":"talks"},{"content":"","date":"30 November 2021","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/categories/project/","section":"Categories","summary":"","title":"Project","type":"categories"},{"content":"The \u0026ldquo;One for Another: Supporting refugees’ integration and strengthening community networks\u0026rdquo; project started in August 2021 and ended in November 2021. This project received support and funding from the International Organization for Migration (IOM) under the EU IPA II project “Regional Support to Protection Sensitive Migration Management in the Western Balkans and Turkey”. Under the Psychosocial Innovation Network (PIN) guidance, this project supported the local community’s integration and acceptance of unaccompanied refugee minors (UAMs).\nYouths are the future leaders and promoters of social change in Serbian society. Thus, this project is focused on promoting tolerance, intercultural sensitivity, and social cohesion and reducing xenophobia among Serbian youths. The project was designed to encourage and create peer-to-peer support networks between locals and refugees through psycho-educational workshops, engagement sessions and integration activities. Workshops and activities were held in refugee homes for UAMs, local schools and youth centres across Belgrade and Loznica, a town bordering Bosnia-Herzegovina.\nPsycho-educational Workshops in Local Schools and Youth Centres # Workshops on Discrimination and Intercultural Sensitivity were held in local schools and youth centres based in Belgrade, Belgrade, Karaburma, Jeleznik and Loznica. These workshops focused on the consequences of discrimination and the importance of intercultural sensitivity. Local students were the primary audience of the workshops, with teachers and school psychologists as observers.\nThe workshops were facilitated in a group discussion style, allowing students to explore topics of interest and empowering them to share their opinions. As such, the students could safely voice their concerns on issues of discrimination that were important to them, such as LGBTQ rights, gender equality, and school bullying. At the end of the workshops, students were provided feedback through the workshop evaluation sheet.\nEngagement Sessions in Rescue Homes for Unaccompanied Minors (UAMs) # Engagement sessions were organised and facilitated for refugee UAMs in rescue homes based in Belgrade and Loznica. These sessions aimed to build connection and trust with the refugee UAMs. It was an opportunity to assess their openness and readiness to connect with local youths. With the help of interpreters, various activities and discussions were facilitated, such as discussions on multiculturalism, gender roles, and even exploring musical instruments. The activities were designed to be age-appropriate.\nLike the psycho-educational workshop in local schools, these sessions were conducted in a facilitative group discussion style. These sessions last from 1.5 hours to 2 hours. The UAMs came from various countries, such as Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, China, Congo, Cameroon and Niger. Their ages ranged from 8 to 18 years old.\nUAMs were given space to explore their interests and empowered to voice their opinions. In every session, UAMs gained confidence in sharing their experiences and perspectives. Due to COVID-19 restriction measures, more than half of the sessions were held online.\nIntegration Activities for Refugee Unaccompanied Minors (UAMs) and Local Students # Integration activities were organised and facilitated for refugee UAMs and local students in Belgrade and Loznica. The purpose of integration activities was to provide a safe space for intercultural contact and interaction between local youths and refugee UAMs. The sessions were designed to create a safe and relaxed atmosphere to facilitate ease of connection and relationship building.\nConsidering weather conditions and COVID-19 restrictions, activities were selected based on the interests and suggestions of the local youths and refugee UAMs. Every participant made an effort to get to know each other. At the end of each session, there were good exchanges between the UAMs and local youths.\nThe project concluded with a conference where Serbian youths and refugee UAMs shared their experience at a local school in Karaburma. My deepest gratitude to Maša Vukčević Marković, Aleksandra Nicović and Ana Milić and the PIN team for their openness, guidance and for the opportunity to be included in this project.\n","date":"30 November 2021","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/projects/one-for-another/","section":"Current and Past Projects","summary":"","title":"The \"One for Another\" Project","type":"projects"},{"content":"","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/authors/","section":"Authors","summary":"","title":"Authors","type":"authors"},{"content":"","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/series/","section":"Series","summary":"","title":"Series","type":"series"},{"content":"","externalUrl":null,"permalink":"/tags/","section":"Tags","summary":"","title":"Tags","type":"tags"}]